<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Apple&#8217;s iPhone Restricted To AT&#038;T Only In the US	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://socialmediaseo.net/2010/04/13/apples-iphone-restricted-to-att-only-in-the-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://socialmediaseo.net/2010/04/13/apples-iphone-restricted-to-att-only-in-the-us/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=apples-iphone-restricted-to-att-only-in-the-us</link>
	<description>Social Media &#38; Tech News and Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim S from DC		</title>
		<link>https://socialmediaseo.net/2010/04/13/apples-iphone-restricted-to-att-only-in-the-us/#comment-6134</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim S from DC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preview.socialmediaseo.net/?p=9484#comment-6134</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AT&#038;T has significantly improved both the reliability and speed of it&#039;s service.  This can be seen especially in the last 6 months.  So I take issue with your statement, &#034;Yet here in the United States, we are subject to being confined to AT&#038;T and their TERRIBLE SERVICE, connections, and broken 3G coverage.&#034; 
 
In recent tests AT&#038;T&#039;s 3G data service routinely outperforms any other carrier in terms of speed.  Often clocking speeds at greater than 2X Verizon.  In addition, their recently released microcell offer is a very slick solution for those who have coverage issues in their home. Unlike similar Sprint or Verizon offers, the AT&#038;T Microcell delivers both voice and data via 3G with a simple hookup to a broadband connection in the home. 
 
So when you look at the facts and refrain from listening to the whiners from last year, AT&#038;T has great service and continues to plow more dollars into their network infrastructure than any other carrier. 
 
I am delighted with their service and would not consider switching to another carrier of the iPhone even if they gave the phone to me. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T has significantly improved both the reliability and speed of it&#039;s service.  This can be seen especially in the last 6 months.  So I take issue with your statement, &quot;Yet here in the United States, we are subject to being confined to AT&amp;T and their TERRIBLE SERVICE, connections, and broken 3G coverage.&quot; </p>
<p>In recent tests AT&amp;T&#039;s 3G data service routinely outperforms any other carrier in terms of speed.  Often clocking speeds at greater than 2X Verizon.  In addition, their recently released microcell offer is a very slick solution for those who have coverage issues in their home. Unlike similar Sprint or Verizon offers, the AT&amp;T Microcell delivers both voice and data via 3G with a simple hookup to a broadband connection in the home. </p>
<p>So when you look at the facts and refrain from listening to the whiners from last year, AT&amp;T has great service and continues to plow more dollars into their network infrastructure than any other carrier. </p>
<p>I am delighted with their service and would not consider switching to another carrier of the iPhone even if they gave the phone to me. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Justin		</title>
		<link>https://socialmediaseo.net/2010/04/13/apples-iphone-restricted-to-att-only-in-the-us/#comment-6100</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preview.socialmediaseo.net/?p=9484#comment-6100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[All the carriers they are on are GSM not CDMA so for apple to make a CDMA version for one carrier only is suicide!  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the carriers they are on are GSM not CDMA so for apple to make a CDMA version for one carrier only is suicide!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patty		</title>
		<link>https://socialmediaseo.net/2010/04/13/apples-iphone-restricted-to-att-only-in-the-us/#comment-5972</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preview.socialmediaseo.net/?p=9484#comment-5972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you owned/operated Apple... which carrier would you sign an exclusive 3-4 agreement with: 
   
1.  A company that will pay you $400 for every phone you sell (plus another $200 from the user). 
  
or 
 
2.  A company that will pay you $0 for each phone.  (And you&#039;ll sell very few if you try to get the entire $600 from the user.) 
   
(Remember... when AT&#038;T and Apple signed their agreement... the iPhone was buggy, untested, unheard of, unproven, and unknown.) 
 
 ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you owned/operated Apple&#8230; which carrier would you sign an exclusive 3-4 agreement with: </p>
<p>1.  A company that will pay you $400 for every phone you sell (plus another $200 from the user). </p>
<p>or </p>
<p>2.  A company that will pay you $0 for each phone.  (And you&#039;ll sell very few if you try to get the entire $600 from the user.) </p>
<p>(Remember&#8230; when AT&amp;T and Apple signed their agreement&#8230; the iPhone was buggy, untested, unheard of, unproven, and unknown.) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patty		</title>
		<link>https://socialmediaseo.net/2010/04/13/apples-iphone-restricted-to-att-only-in-the-us/#comment-36454</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preview.socialmediaseo.net/?p=9484#comment-36454</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you owned/operated Apple... which carrier would you sign an exclusive 3-4 agreement with: 
   
1.  A company that will pay you $400 for every phone you sell (plus another $200 from the user). 
  
or 
 
2.  A company that will pay you $0 for each phone.  (And you&#039;ll sell very few if you try to get the entire $600 from the user.) 
   
(Remember... when AT&#038;T and Apple signed their agreement... the iPhone was buggy, untested, unheard of, unproven, and unknown.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you owned/operated Apple&#8230; which carrier would you sign an exclusive 3-4 agreement with: </p>
<p>1.  A company that will pay you $400 for every phone you sell (plus another $200 from the user). </p>
<p>or </p>
<p>2.  A company that will pay you $0 for each phone.  (And you&#039;ll sell very few if you try to get the entire $600 from the user.) </p>
<p>(Remember&#8230; when AT&amp;T and Apple signed their agreement&#8230; the iPhone was buggy, untested, unheard of, unproven, and unknown.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
