<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: LightSquared 4G Satellite Cloud To Cover Entire US, Sorry Sprint	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://socialmediaseo.net/2010/07/20/4g-satellite-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://socialmediaseo.net/2010/07/20/4g-satellite-cloud/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=4g-satellite-cloud</link>
	<description>Social Media &#38; Tech News and Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 16:06:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Guest1		</title>
		<link>https://socialmediaseo.net/2010/07/20/4g-satellite-cloud/#comment-31321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preview.socialmediaseo.net/?p=17362#comment-31321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Satellite is well know for having extreme latency which prevents most online gaming, VPN and anything needing quick small data transfers.  Will this hybrid solution solve those issues even in the rural areas?  Current satellite is not a viable solution where 3G from sprint is working great for me.  I would welcome the additional bandwith and competition, but not at the sacrifice of latency inherent with the physical limitations of satellite.  I would be interested to see if the hybrid solution would be able utilize on-earth infrastructure for when I&#039;m typing on the command line of a server, but be able to pump in the additional bandwith promised from satellite when I need to download or stream a large file. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satellite is well know for having extreme latency which prevents most online gaming, VPN and anything needing quick small data transfers.  Will this hybrid solution solve those issues even in the rural areas?  Current satellite is not a viable solution where 3G from sprint is working great for me.  I would welcome the additional bandwith and competition, but not at the sacrifice of latency inherent with the physical limitations of satellite.  I would be interested to see if the hybrid solution would be able utilize on-earth infrastructure for when I&#039;m typing on the command line of a server, but be able to pump in the additional bandwith promised from satellite when I need to download or stream a large file. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
